Coronavirus19 13s2:
KRIMINALITÄT+Profiteure mit kriminellen Genimpfungen
Täter Netzwerke: Impfmonster Facebook
01
17.5.2020: Die Mossad-Regierung Merkel ist von Bill
Gates und Melinda Gates DIREKT GESTEUERT - durch eine
"Absichtserklärung" vom Feb. 2017 - Link
17.5.2020: Die Mossad-Regierung in der Schweiz ist von
Bill Gates und Meldinda Gates DIREKT GESTEUERT - durch
eine "Absichtserklärung" vom 22.1.2014 - Link
-- Liste
der Heilmethoden gegen
Corona19 (medizinische
Lebensmittel, Weihrauch,
Plasma, falsche
Heilmittel, nie impfen,
Orte der Ansteckungen
etc. - Liste
Link)
-- Beste Prävention oder
Heilmittel gegen eine
Grippe ist medizinische
Ernährung+Blutgruppenernährung+früh
schlafengehen+Natron mit
Apfelessig (Link)
-- Vorerkrankungen
heilen meist mit Natron
weg (Merkblatt
Natron)
Facebook =
Spitzelstaat 15.9.2022: Spionage von privaten Chats -
Meldung von Wahrheitswissern an das FBI (!): Facebook spied on private messages of
Americans who questioned 2020 election
https://nypost.com/2022/09/14/facebook-spied-on-private-messages-of-americans-who-questioned-2020-election/
https://t.me/oliverjanich/107553
Facebook has been spying on the private messages and
data of American users and reporting
them to the FBI if they express
anti-government or anti-authority sentiments — or
question the
2020 election — according to sources within
the Department of Justice.
Under the FBI collaboration operation, somebody at
Facebook red-flagged these supposedly subversive private
messages over the past 19 months and transmitted them in
redacted form to the domestic terrorism operational unit
at FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, without a subpoena.
“It was done outside the legal process and without
probable cause,” alleged one of the sources, who spoke on
condition of anonymity.
“Facebook provides the FBI with private conversations
which are protected by the First Amendment without any
subpoena.”
These private messages then have been farmed out as
“leads” to FBI field offices around the country, which
subsequently requested subpoenas from the partner US
Attorney’s Office in their district to officially obtain
the private conversations that Facebook already had shown
them.
But when the targeted Facebook users were investigated by
agents in a local FBI field office, sometimes using covert
surveillance techniques, nothing criminal or violent
turned up.
Facebook
spied on the private messages of Americans who
questioned the 2020 election, DOJ souces said. NurPhoto via Getty ImagesUnder
the FBI collaboration operation, someone at Facebook
red-flagged supposedly subversive private messages over
the past 19 months.NurPhoto via Getty Images
“It was a waste of our time,” said one source familiar
with subpoena requests lodged during a 19-month frenzy by
FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, to produce the
caseload to match the Biden administration’s rhetoric on
domestic terrorism after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.
‘Red-blooded Americans’
The Facebook users whose private communications Facebook
had red-flagged as domestic terrorism for the FBI were all
“conservative right-wing individuals.”
“They were gun-toting, red-blooded Americans [who were]
angry after the election and shooting off their mouths and
talking about staging protests. There was nothing
criminal, nothing about violence or massacring or
assassinating anyone.
“As soon as a subpoena was requested, within an hour,
Facebook sent back gigabytes of data and photos. It was
ready to go. They were just waiting for that legal process
so they could send it.”
Facebook denied the allegations yesterday.
In two contrasting statements sent one hour apart, Erica
Sackin, a spokesperson at Facebook’s parent company, Meta,
claimed Facebook’s interactions with the FBI were designed
to “protect people from harm.”
In her first statement, she said: “These claims are false
because they reflect a misunderstanding of how our systems
protect people from harm and how we engage with law
enforcement. We carefully scrutinize all government
requests for user information to make sure they’re legally
valid and narrowly tailored and we often push back. We
respond to legal requests for information in accordance
with applicable law and our terms and we provide notice to
users whenever permitted.”
In a second, unprompted “updated statement,” sent 64
minutes later, Sackin altered her language to say the
claims are “wrong,” not “false.”
“These claims are just wrong. The suggestion we seek out
peoples’ private messages for anti-government language or
questions about the validity of past elections and then
proactively supply those to the FBI is plainly inaccurate
and there is zero evidence to support it,” said Sackin, a
DC-based crisis response expert who previously worked for
Planned Parenthood and “Obama for America” and now leads
Facebook’s communications on “counterterrorism and
dangerous organizations and individuals.”
Agency doublespeak
In a statement Wednesday, the FBI neither confirmed nor
denied allegations put to it about its joint operation
with Facebook, which is designated as “unclassified/law
enforcement sensitive.”
Responding to questions about the misuse of data only of
American users, the statement curiously focused on
“foreign malign influence actors” but did acknowledge that
the nature of the FBI’s relationship with social media
providers enables a “quick exchange” of information, and
is an “ongoing dialogue.”
“The FBI maintains relationships with U.S. private sector
entities, including social media providers. The FBI has
provided companies with foreign threat indicators to help
them protect their platforms and customers from abuse by
foreign malign influence actors. U.S. companies have also
referred information to the FBI with investigative value
relating to foreign malign influence. The FBI works
closely with interagency partners, as well as state and
local partners, to ensure we’re sharing information as it
becomes available. This can include threat information,
actionable leads, or indicators. The FBI has also
established relationships with a variety of social media
and technology companies and maintains an ongoing dialogue
to enable a quick exchange of threat information.”
Facebook’s denial that it proactively provides the FBI
with private user data without a subpoena or search
warrant, if true, would indicate that the initial transfer
has been done by a person (or persons) at the company
designated as a “confidential human source” by the FBI,
someone with the authority to access and search users’
private messages.
In this way, Facebook would have “plausible deniability”
if questions arose about misuse of users’ data and its
employee’s confidentiality would be protected by the FBI.
“They had access to searching and they were able to
pinpoint it, to identify these conversations from millions
of conversations,” according to one of the DOJ sources.
‘None were Antifa types’
Before any subpoena was sought, “that information had
already been provided to [FBI] headquarters. The lead
already contained specifics of the information inside the
[users’ private] messages. Some of it was redacted but
most of it was not. They basically had a portion of the
conversation and then would skip past the next portion, so
it was the most egregious parts highlighted and taken out
of context.
“But when you read the full conversation in context
[after issuing the subpoena] it didn’t sound as bad …
There was no plan or orchestration to carry out any kind
of violence.”
Some of the targeted Americans had posted photos of
themselves “shooting guns together and bitching about
what’s happened [after the 2020 election]. A few were
members of a militia but that was protected by the Second
Amendment …
“They [Facebook and the FBI] were looking for
conservative right-wing individuals. None were Antifa
types.”
One private conversation targeted for investigation “spun
up into multiple cases because there were multiple
individuals in all these different chats.”
The DOJ sources have decided to speak to The Post, and
risk their careers, because they are concerned that
federal law enforcement has been politicized and is
abusing the constitutional rights of innocent
Americans.
They say more whistleblowers are ready to join them.
Unrest has been building among the rank and file across
the FBI and in some parts of the DOJ for months. It came
to a head after the raid last month on former President
Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago
home in Florida.
“The most frightening thing is the combined power of Big
Tech colluding with the enforcement arm of the FBI,” says
one whistleblower. “Google,
Facebook and Twitter,
these companies are globalist. They don’t have our
national interest at heart.”
9.10.2022: Facebook scheint
weniger zu zensieren
Impfschäden Schweiz Coronaimpfung, [09.10.2022 11:10]
https://t.me/Impfschaden_Corona_Schweiz/55336
Eine neue Meldung:
Gutem Morgen
Zur Info. Ich wurde auf Facebook immer wieder gesperrt, weil
ich kritische Beträge teilte. Was mich nicht davon
abgehalten hat weiter zu machen. Mir ist aber aufgefallen,
dass ich seit einer ganzen Weile Beiträge Teile, die früher
sofort geblockt wurden und nun keine Problem zu sein
scheinen.
Aus diesem Grunde möchte ich alle die einen Account haben
dazu motivieren dort Beiträge zu teilen. Die Reichweite ist
dort ja sehr gross.
"USA"
Kriminelles
Zensur-Facebook 16.11.2022: Die Wahrheit mit
Impfschäden "verunsichert" - also zensieren: Facebook zensiert Beiträge über Impfschäden, weil sie
«die Menschen verunsichern»
https://transition-news.org/facebook-zensiert-beitrage-uber-impfschaden-weil-sie-die-menschen-verunsichern
https://t.me/Impfschaden_Corona_Schweiz/58709
Impfschäden Schweiz Coronaimpfung, [16.11.2022
08:00]
Seit Beginn der Impfkampagne gegen «Covid»
zensiert Facebook kritische Beiträge. Auch Transition
News ist davon regelmässig betroffen. Bislang
beruhte die Zensur auf sogenannten «unabhängigen
Faktenprüfern» – die jedoch alles andere als unabhängig
sind und die Wissenschaft stets im Sinne des offiziellen
Narrativs verdrehen.
Nun macht sich das Unternehmen offenbar nicht
einmal mehr diese Mühe, wie der Daily Sceptic berichtet. So
erhielt der Autor und Wirtschaftswissenschaftler
Thorsteinn Siglaugsson eine E-Mail eines Freundes mit
einem Hinweis von Facebook. Darauf ist zu lesen,
dass ein Post des Freundes blockiert wurde, weil er gegen
die «Community Standards» über «Fehlinformationen»
verstosse. Weiter erklärt das Unternehmen:
«Wir haben diese Standards, weil Fehlinformationen über
Impfungen einige Menschen auf Facebook
verunsichern könnten.»
Quelle: The Daily Sceptic/Thorsteinn
Siglaugsson/Facebbok
Bei dem Post handelte es sich um einen Clip,
in dem der Fox-Reporter Tucker Carlson die «negative
Wirksamkeit» der Gen-Präparate erörtert und sich dabei auf
begutachtete Studien beruft. Siglaugsson fragt sich, was
damit genau gemeint ist, dass diese Informationen «einige
Menschen verunsichern» könnten. Denn unsicher fühle sich
jemand zum Beispiel, nachdem er von einem vertrauten
Menschen getäuscht wurde oder wenn seine Weltanschauung
bedroht wird.
Zensur
durch den kriminellen Mossad auf Facebook weltweit
6.12.2022: hat eine "gehorsame Wissenschaft" geschaffen: „Corona-Impfungen“: So sieht „gehorsame Wissenschaft“
aus
https://freie-impfentscheidung.de/corona-gehorsame-wissenschaft/
https://t.me/Impfschaden_Corona_Schweiz/60640
Impfschäden Schweiz Coronaimpfung,
[06.12.2022 13:47]
Im Rennen um die besten „wissenschaftlichen“ Erkenntnisse
rund um die modRNA-„Impfungen“ gibt es jetzt eine tolle
Arbeit aus der Uni Erlangen. Denn die hat ganz spezifische
Spätfolgen der Gen-Injektionen feststellen können: Die
üblichen Antikörper vom Typ IgG1 verwandeln sich wie von
Zauberhand und unerwartet zu IgG4.
Und damit verschwände die „Fähigkeit zur adaptiven
Immunreaktion“.
Kommt da etwa Kritik aus der Uni Erlangen an den
Gen-Injektionen als Mittel zur Bekämpfung der
Corona-„Pandemie“?