ENGL - ESP  
<<        >>

Coronavirus19 13s2: KRIMINALITÄT+Profiteure mit kriminellen Genimpfungen

Täter Netzwerke: Impfmonster Facebook 01

17.5.2020: Die Mossad-Regierung Merkel ist von Bill Gates und Melinda Gates DIREKT GESTEUERT - durch eine "Absichtserklärung" vom Feb. 2017 - Link
17.5.2020: Die Mossad-Regierung in der Schweiz ist von Bill Gates und Meldinda Gates DIREKT GESTEUERT - durch eine "Absichtserklärung" vom 22.1.2014 - Link

-- Liste der Heilmethoden gegen Corona19 (medizinische Lebensmittel, Weihrauch, Plasma, falsche Heilmittel, nie impfen, Orte der Ansteckungen etc. -  Liste Link)
-- Beste Prävention oder Heilmittel gegen eine Grippe ist medizinische Ernährung+Blutgruppenernährung+früh schlafengehen+Natron mit Apfelessig (Link)
-- Vorerkrankungen heilen meist mit Natron weg (Merkblatt Natron) 

 Meldungen

präsentiert von Michael Palomino

Facebook = Spitzelstaat 15.9.2022: Spionage von privaten Chats - Meldung von Wahrheitswissern an das FBI (!):
Facebook spied on private messages of Americans who questioned 2020 election
https://nypost.com/2022/09/14/facebook-spied-on-private-messages-of-americans-who-questioned-2020-election/
https://t.me/oliverjanich/107553

Facebook has been spying on the private messages and data of American users and reporting them to the FBI if they express anti-government or anti-authority sentiments — or question the 2020 election — according to sources within the Department of Justice.

Under the FBI collaboration operation, somebody at Facebook red-flagged these supposedly subversive private messages over the past 19 months and transmitted them in redacted form to the domestic terrorism operational unit at FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, without a subpoena.

“It was done outside the legal process and without probable cause,” alleged one of the sources, who spoke on condition of ­anonymity.

“Facebook provides the FBI with private conversations which are protected by the First Amendment without any subpoena.”

These private messages then have been farmed out as “leads” to FBI field offices around the country, which subsequently requested subpoenas from the partner US Attorney’s Office in their district to officially obtain the private conversations that Facebook already had shown them.

But when the targeted Facebook users were investigated by agents in a local FBI field office, sometimes using covert surveillance techniques, nothing criminal or violent turned up.

“It was a waste of our time,” said one source familiar with subpoena requests lodged during a 19-month frenzy by FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, to produce the caseload to match the Biden administration’s rhetoric on domestic terrorism after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

‘Red-blooded Americans’

The Facebook users whose private communications Facebook had red-flagged as domestic terrorism for the FBI were all “conservative right-wing individuals.”

“They were gun-toting, red-blooded Americans [who were] angry after the election and shooting off their mouths and talking about staging protests. There was nothing criminal, nothing about violence or massacring or assassinating anyone.

“As soon as a subpoena was requested, within an hour, Facebook sent back gigabytes of data and photos. It was ready to go. They were just waiting for that legal process so they could send it.”

Facebook denied the allegations yesterday.

In two contrasting statements sent one hour apart, Erica Sackin, a spokesperson at Facebook’s parent company, Meta, claimed Facebook’s interactions with the FBI were designed to “protect people from harm.”

In her first statement, she said: “These claims are false because they reflect a misunderstanding of how our systems protect people from harm and how we engage with law enforcement. We carefully scrutinize all government requests for user information to make sure they’re legally valid and narrowly tailored and we often push back. We respond to legal requests for information in accordance with applicable law and our terms and we provide notice to users whenever permitted.”

In a second, unprompted “updated statement,” sent 64 minutes later, Sackin altered her language to say the claims are “wrong,” not “false.”

“These claims are just wrong. The suggestion we seek out peoples’ private messages for anti-government language or questions about the validity of past elections and then proactively supply those to the FBI is plainly inaccurate and there is zero evidence to support it,” said Sackin, a DC-based crisis response expert who previously worked for Planned Parenthood and “Obama for America” and now leads Facebook’s communications on “counterterrorism and dangerous organizations and individuals.”

Agency doublespeak

In a statement Wednesday, the FBI neither confirmed nor denied allegations put to it about its joint operation with Facebook, which is designated as “unclassified/law enforcement sensitive.”

Responding to questions about the misuse of data only of American users, the statement curiously focused on “foreign malign influence actors” but did acknowledge that the nature of the FBI’s relationship with social media providers enables a “quick exchange” of information, and is an “ongoing dialogue.”

“The FBI maintains relationships with U.S. private sector entities, including social media providers. The FBI has provided companies with foreign threat indicators to help them protect their platforms and customers from abuse by foreign malign influence actors. U.S. companies have also referred information to the FBI with investigative value relating to foreign malign influence. The FBI works closely with interagency partners, as well as state and local partners, to ensure we’re sharing information as it becomes available. This can include threat information, actionable leads, or indicators. The FBI has also established relationships with a variety of social media and technology companies and maintains an ongoing dialogue to enable a quick exchange of threat information.”

Facebook’s denial that it proactively provides the FBI with private user data without a subpoena or search warrant, if true, would indicate that the initial transfer has been done by a person (or persons) at the company designated as a “confidential human source” by the FBI, someone with the authority to access and search users’ private messages.

In this way, Facebook would have “plausible deniability” if questions arose about misuse of users’ data and its employee’s confidentiality would be protected by the FBI.

“They had access to searching and they were able to pinpoint it, to identify these conversations from millions of conversations,” according to one of the DOJ ­sources.

‘None were Antifa types’

Before any subpoena was sought, “that information had already been provided to [FBI] headquarters. The lead already contained specifics of the information inside the [users’ private] messages. Some of it was redacted but most of it was not. They basically had a portion of the conversation and then would skip past the next portion, so it was the most egregious parts highlighted and taken out of context.

“But when you read the full conversation in context [after issuing the subpoena] it didn’t sound as bad … There was no plan or orchestration to carry out any kind of violence.”

Some of the targeted Americans had posted photos of themselves “shooting guns together and bitching about what’s happened [after the 2020 election]. A few were members of a militia but that was protected by the Second Amendment …

“They [Facebook and the FBI] were looking for conservative right-wing individuals. None were Antifa types.”

One private conversation targeted for investigation “spun up into multiple cases because there were multiple individuals in all these different chats.”

The DOJ sources have decided to speak to The Post, and risk their careers, because they are concerned that federal law enforcement has been politicized and is abusing the constitutional rights of innocent Americans. 

They say more whistleblowers are ready to join them.

What do you think? Post a comment.

Unrest has been building among the rank and file across the FBI and in some parts of the DOJ for months. It came to a head after the raid last month on former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida. 

“The most frightening thing is the combined power of Big Tech colluding with the enforcement arm of the FBI,” says one whistleblower. “Google, Facebook and Twitter, these companies are globalist. They don’t have our national interest at heart.”

---

9.10.2022: Facebook scheint weniger zu zensieren
Impfschäden Schweiz Coronaimpfung, [09.10.2022 11:10]
https://t.me/Impfschaden_Corona_Schweiz/55336
Eine neue Meldung:
Gutem Morgen
Zur Info. Ich wurde auf Facebook immer wieder gesperrt, weil ich kritische Beträge teilte. Was mich nicht davon abgehalten hat weiter zu machen. Mir ist aber aufgefallen, dass ich seit einer ganzen Weile Beiträge Teile, die früher sofort geblockt wurden und nun keine Problem zu sein scheinen.
Aus diesem Grunde möchte ich alle die einen Account haben dazu motivieren dort Beiträge zu teilen. Die Reichweite ist dort ja sehr gross.

---

"USA"

Kriminelles Zensur-Facebook 16.11.2022: Die Wahrheit mit Impfschäden "verunsichert" - also zensieren:
Facebook zensiert Beiträge über Impfschäden, weil sie «die Menschen verunsichern»
https://transition-news.org/facebook-zensiert-beitrage-uber-impfschaden-weil-sie-die-menschen-verunsichern
https://t.me/Impfschaden_Corona_Schweiz/58709
Impfschäden Schweiz Coronaimpfung, [16.11.2022 08:00]

Seit Beginn der Impfkampagne gegen «Covid» zensiert Facebook kritische Beiträge. Auch Transition News ist davon regelmässig betroffen. Bislang beruhte die Zensur auf sogenannten «unabhängigen Faktenprüfern» – die jedoch alles andere als unabhängig sind und die Wissenschaft stets im Sinne des offiziellen Narrativs verdrehen.

Nun macht sich das Unternehmen offenbar nicht einmal mehr diese Mühe, wie der Daily Sceptic berichtet. So erhielt der Autor und Wirtschaftswissenschaftler Thorsteinn Siglaugsson eine E-Mail eines Freundes mit einem Hinweis von Facebook. Darauf ist zu lesen, dass ein Post des Freundes blockiert wurde, weil er gegen die «Community Standards» über «Fehlinformationen» verstosse. Weiter erklärt das Unternehmen:

«Wir haben diese Standards, weil Fehlinformationen über Impfungen einige Menschen auf Facebook verunsichern könnten.»

Quelle: The Daily Sceptic/Thorsteinn Siglaugsson/Facebbok

Bei dem Post handelte es sich um einen Clip, in dem der Fox-Reporter Tucker Carlson die «negative Wirksamkeit» der Gen-Präparate erörtert und sich dabei auf begutachtete Studien beruft. Siglaugsson fragt sich, was damit genau gemeint ist, dass diese Informationen «einige Menschen verunsichern» könnten. Denn unsicher fühle sich jemand zum Beispiel, nachdem er von einem vertrauten Menschen getäuscht wurde oder wenn seine Weltanschauung bedroht wird.

---

Zensur durch den kriminellen Mossad auf Facebook weltweit 6.12.2022: hat eine "gehorsame Wissenschaft" geschaffen:
„Corona-Impfungen“: So sieht „gehorsame Wissenschaft“ aus
https://freie-impfentscheidung.de/corona-gehorsame-wissenschaft/
https://t.me/Impfschaden_Corona_Schweiz/60640
Impfschäden Schweiz Coronaimpfung, [06.12.2022 13:47]

Im Rennen um die besten „wissenschaftlichen“ Erkenntnisse rund um die modRNA-„Impfungen“ gibt es jetzt eine tolle Arbeit aus der Uni Erlangen. Denn die hat ganz spezifische Spätfolgen der Gen-Injektionen feststellen können: Die üblichen Antikörper vom Typ IgG1 verwandeln sich wie von Zauberhand und unerwartet zu IgG4.

Und damit verschwände die „Fähigkeit zur adaptiven Immunreaktion“.

Kommt da etwa Kritik aus der Uni Erlangen an den Gen-Injektionen als Mittel zur Bekämpfung der Corona-„Pandemie“?

---

<<        >>

Quellen




Fotoquellen
[1] https://vk.com/fritz1956#/fritz1956?z=photo463459746_457254737%2Fwall417878056_72367

                                      

         

           

                    

^